Ĉu la Merkatado de Apple suĉas?

Depositphotos 24060249 s

Kiu merkatado vere gajnas ĉi tie, Apple aŭ Microsoft? Alklaku tra se vi ne vidas la filmeton.

Ĉi tiu afiŝo estis inspirita de konversacio, pri kiu mi aliĝis Microsoft gajnas iom da grundo kontraŭ Apple. La konversacio daŭris en Twitter per bonega tweet de Kara:

de karaweber: @douglaskarr ĝuis la hodiaŭan afiŝon. Snarky estas ekstere, kaj la kampanjo "Mi estas Mac" komencas legi kiel snarky. (FTR, ankaŭ mi estas fano de Apple).

Mi esperas, ke ĉi tio estigas grandegan debaton. Apple estas rigardata kiel unu el la plej bonaj merkataj teamoj en Teknologio hodiaŭ, sed mi komencas pensi pri iliaj klopodoj. Ĉu merkatado ludis grandegan rolon en la lastatempa sukceso de Apple? Aŭ ĉu ĝi estis simple disponebla enspezo? Bonvolu ne miksi produkton kun merkatado pri tio - mi konstatas, ke la iPhone ŝanĝas ludon en la industrio. Mia demando ne estas ĉu Apple havas aŭ ne bonegajn produktojn, sed kiom multe da efiko la merkatado havis sur la grandega kresko de Apple en vendoj?

Ĉu vere la merkatado de Apple faris la diferencon?

Kiam tempoj estas malglataj kaj disponebla enspezo malpliiĝas, konsumantoj kaj entreprenoj devas fari pli malfacilajn aĉetajn decidojn. Ĉar Microsoft reakiras merkatan kotizon de Apple pri aĵoj kiel tekkomputiloj, ŝajnas, ke Microsoft gajnas la valora milito. Tio estas, la merkatado de Apple de malvarmeta, eleganta dezajno, facileco de uzo kaj malpli da problemoj ... ne funkcias.

Tio signifas, ke inteligentaj konsumantoj ne kredas, ke la kosto de Apple valoras ĝin plu. Apple ne argumentas ... kaj mi ne kredas (nek Kara), ke snarkaj reklamoj helpas ilin. Fakte, mi pensas, ke ili eble nur sonas kiel iuj dorlotitaj infanoj fanfaronantaj pri sia plej nova ludilo kaj donantaj la fingron al la establo (tio estas mi kaj vi).

Eble estas tempo por mortigi la tutan kampanjon Mac kontraŭ komputilo.

Ŝlosila elemento al bonega merkatado estas ĝustatempeco. Gravas, ke via merkatado restu rilata al via spektantaro ... kaj ŝanĝoj en la ekonomio influas aĉetajn decidojn de homoj. Rezulte, estas grave adapti laŭe. Estas tempo por Apple agordi.

9 Komentoj

  1. 1

    Doug,

    I think your last paragraph explains why Apple is losing market share. The consumer mindset has changed drastically over the last year or so and Apple has yet to change their marketing strategy. Microsoft has, the under $1500 laptop commercials go right to the heart of a cost conscious consumer.

    adam

  2. 2
  3. 3

    I think they are, and have been for some time, marketing to a certain knowledge level. For people who really don’t want to tinker at all with their machines (definitely not me), their marketing is effective since it attempts to show off how simple they are. Their ad promoting the “Geniuses” does nothing for me, I really don’t want to and can’t get to an overcrowded mall during normal business hours, but I CAN search online to get help from the 90%+ market share of PC users. Their “Elimination” ad tries to tell me that only one choice is good, yet when I bought my latest laptop, Mac’s were passed over because they didn’t have the right feature set I needed, but I was able to find the right PC that had everything I wanted.

  4. 4

    I was a fan of the subtle jabs made in the first couple of series of Mac adds. But I thought they took too negative of a turn about 9 months ago, about the time the “Vista bashing” began. Since then, my opinion of their ads has steadily declined.

    To me, the more recent ads do a better job of making existing Mac users feel superior about their choice than it does to bring new users into the fold. Gently (and comically) show the benefits of your product and people will come over to your side. Overtly insult the competition, and indirectly those that use it, and you risk alienation and stubborn refusal to even consider a change.

    I’m not sure how effective the Microsoft Laptop Hunter ads are overall, but they do at least demonstrate the price and variety advantages of Windows-based computers. Me personally, I wanted a $2,800 17″ MacBook Pro, but I purchased a $325 Windows-based netbook. The netbook is the complete opposite of the MacBook Pro, but the price difference caused me to reconsider what is essential vs. what would be really nice to have.

    Apple will always have a loyal tech-enthusiast following, and in addition there will be those that are willing to pay more for greater usability. But the current economy is forcing more people to make decisions based solely on upfront cost, and that has never been a market segment where Apple looks to compete. And their current ads are in no way improving this situation, for better or worse.

  5. 5
  6. 6

    I think you’re confusing marketing kaj reklamanta.

    Apple’s marketing since the return of Jobs has been undeniably brilliant while some individual advertisements and campaigns have occasionally fallen short.

    I believe that the argument that Apple’s recent huge successes are due to marketing is absolutely false. The cornerstone of Apple’s strategy has always been making great products, not great marketing.

    The iPod was a huge success not because of the dancing silhouette commercials, but because it was/is a phenomenal product that was/is far and above superior to anything else on the market.

    Regardless of economic conditions, consumers will always pay for great products. Apple was founded in a recession and continues to thrive in this recession.

    The claim that Microsoft is gaining market-share on Apple may be a bit premature. The raportoj that I have seen seem to claim the opposite.

    • 7

      Hi Brian!

      Though I mention the ads, I’m still questioning the marketing, not the advertising. I’m also not questioning the incredible products. I’m responding to this comment via Ipod and my laptop of choice is my MacBookPro. My question is how much weight did Apple’s marketing straegies have in their success? Was it simply wealth the played a role?

  7. 8

    Doug,

    I love this discussion. Thank you for initiating it. In my view, Apple has and will continue to have brilliant marketing. The company has persevered through many downturns, much in part because of their marketing savvy and ability to adjust on a dime. The current ad campaign is only one element of the strategy, which I think many of the comments focus on a bit too heavily. I think the reference to the ad at the start put folks on that track. Regardless, Apple’s marketing strategy involves so much more than a piece of tactical advertising. Product planning, pricing, positioning, design, and timing executed through targeted advertising, pr, event, and other direct and indirect sales strategies and tactics will keep this company in the forefront of marketing discussions for a long time.

  8. 9

    Hi Douglas, sorry to leave an off-topic comment, but it seems the first link, that says to click threw to see a video, is linking out to a video leads to a 404 page, “We couldn’t find that! Either you’re lost or we are!”. Again… my apologies for the off-topic comment.

Kion vi pensas?

Ĉi tiu retejo uzas Akismeton por redukti spamon. Lernu, kiel via komento datiĝas.